Minimum Public Shareholding in India: Rules, Guidelines and Implications

Introduction

In India, Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS) is a critical regulation designed to ensure broader equity participation and market liquidity. Under SEBI’s guidelines, at least 25% of a company’s equity must be held by the public, not promoters. Recently, SEBI has introduced proposals offering relaxed timelines and staggered compliance for large firms. This article unpacks the current rules, recent updates, and what investors and listed companies need to know—clearly and succinctly.

Understanding MPS: Rules and Objectives

What Is Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS)?

Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS) mandates that listed companies in India maintain at least 25% public ownership of their total issued and paid-up equity. This prevents promoter over-concentration, helps ensure fair price discovery, and improves overall market liquidity and corporate governance.

While fresh IPOs and smaller firms must meet the 25% MPS within three years from listing, SEBI now proposes relaxation for firms with ₹50,000–₹1,00,000 crore market cap. They can have five years to comply; those above ₹1,00,000 crore may get up to 10 years.

As of now, state-run entities are exempt from MPS requirements until August 2026, giving them more time to comply. This is especially relevant for public sector banks where the government holds majority stakes.

What is the Purpose behind MPS?

• Enhances market liquidity by increasing shares available for trading.
• Encourages fair price discovery, reducing promoter dominance.
• Reinforces corporate governance by involving broader shareholders.
• Promotes diversified participation from institutional and retail investors.

MPS Rules and Requirements Across Company Sizes

The following table summarizes the MPS rules based on company market capitalization:

Source: SEBI proposals

This detailed compliance framework by SEBI aims to ease the burden of immediate equity dilution but ensures long-term adherence.

Enforcement Example: UltraTech Cement & India Cements

After acquiring control of India Cements, UltraTech Cement's promoter stake soared to around 82%, well above the 75% cap allowed under SEBI regulations. To comply with MPS norms and restore the mandated 25% public shareholding, UltraTech was required to divest approximately 7% of its holdings—valued at over ₹667 crore.

Instead of waiting for the deadline, UltraTech proactively initiated an Offer for Sale (OFS), announcing its plan to sell up to 6.49% stake in India Cements, valued at around ₹745 crore. This move is aimed at bringing its ownership down to the regulatory threshold and ensuring greater market liquidity.

Enforcement Example: Patanjali Foods (formerly Ruchi Soya) and MPS Compliance

After acquiring Ruchi Soya through the insolvency resolution process, Patanjali Foods ended up with nearly 99% promoter holding—far above the allowed limit. To meet SEBI’s minimum public shareholding (MPS) requirement of 25%, Patanjali announced a plan to dilute a 6% stake via institutional share sale (OFS/QIP) in mid-2023. At that time, public ownership stood at just 19.18%, and SEBI forced the promoter group to reduce their stake accordingly to restore public float.

Why MPS Matters for Investors and Markets

• Liquidity: Higher public float ensures ample shares are available for trading—critical for institutional and retail investors alike.
• Fair Valuation: Virtually all stakeholders, not just promoters, influence a company’s valuation through active trading.
• Governance: A broader public base holds promoters and management more accountable.
• Market Depth: Wider share ownership aids stability during market upturns and corrections.

Large companies often claim that immediate dilution through an IPO can flood the market and depress prices—hence SEBI’s shift to phased compliance, which balances investor protection with issuer convenience.

How It Impacts Traders and Investors?

• IPO Decisions: Traders should monitor whether new issuers fall under relaxed MPS norms, affecting short-term liquidity and supply.
• Large-Cap Restructuring: Existing large companies may need to divest shares or raise public float over extended periods—this could impact stock supply and price.
• Corporate Governance Watch: Stocks with low public float might pose risks of price manipulation or governance issues.
• News-Driven Price Moves: Regulatory updates or divestment drives (like UltraTech’s forced divestment) can trigger sudden stock movements.

Minimum Public Shareholding rules are quite essential for a transparent, liquid, and unbiased Indian equity market. While the 25% requirement is a norm, SEBI’s recent proposals to relax thresholds and timelines for large issuers show an effort to support capital formation while protecting investor interests. Traders and investors must now pay attention to company compliance cycles, IPO disclosures, and any other enforcement action. Broad public ownership not only encourages better governance but also supports the integrity of price discovery. Staying updated on MPS developments will help you understand listing trends, stock movement, and also in making long-term investment decisions.

Invest in Indian Markets and Unlock Future Potential With 5paisa!

Open Account Now